Vision of a new journal: Administrative Sciences Research

Authors

  • Bowon Kim KAIST College of Business, Seoul 02455, Korea Author

Abstract

/

References

1. Rafols I, Leydesdorff L, O’Hare A, et al. How journal rankings can suppress interdisciplinary research: A comparison between Innovation Studies and Business & Management. Research Policy. 2012; 41(7): 1262-1282. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2012.03.015

2. Bevir M, Rhodes R. Interpreting British Governance. Routledge; 2003. doi: 10.4324/9780203135914

3. Ostrom E. Governing the Commons. Published online November 30, 1990. doi: 10.1017/cbo9780511807763

4. March JG, Olsen JP. The New Institutionalism: Organizational Factors in Political Life. American Political Science Review. 1983; 78(3): 734-749. doi: 10.2307/1961840

5. Dreze J, Sen A. India: Development and participation. Oxford University Press; 2002.

6. Schmidt VA. Discursive Institutionalism: The Explanatory Power of Ideas and Discourse. Annual Review of Political Science. 2008; 11(1): 303-326. doi: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.060606.135342

7. Escobar A. Encountering development: The making and unmaking of the Third World. Princeton University Press; 1995.

8. Flyvbjerg B. Making Social Science Matter. Published online January 15, 2001. doi: 10.1017/cbo9780511810503

9. Feyerabend P. Against method: Outline of an anarchistic theory of knowledge. New Left Books; 1975.

10. Šiljak DD. Decentralized control of complex systems. Academic Press; 1991.

11. Helbing D. Pluralistic Modeling of Complex Systems. Models, Simulations, and the Reduction of Complexity. Published online November 14, 2013: 53-80. doi: 10.1515/9783110313680.53

12. Lamont M. In praise of methodological pluralism. Harvard University; 2012.

13. Rosen R. Anticipatory systems: Philosophical, mathematical, and methodological foundations. Pergamon Press; 1985.

14. Cartwright N. Hunting Causes and Using Them. Published online May 31, 2007. doi: 10.1017/cbo9780511618758

15. Collier D, Brady HE, Seawright J. Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards, 2nd ed. Rowman & Littlefield; 2010.

16. Shields PM. The Community of Inquiry. Administration & Society. 2003; 35(5): 510-538. doi: 10.1177/0095399703256160

17. Bevir M. Democratic Governance. Published online December 31, 2010. doi: 10.1515/9781400836857

18. Bourdieu P. Homo Academicus. In: Collier P (translator). Stanford University Press; 1988.

19. Geertz C. The Interpretation of Cultures. Basic Books; 1973.

20. Schön DA. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. Basic Books; 1983.

21. Shields PM, Soeters J. Peaceweaving. The American Review of Public Administration. 2016; 47(3): 323-339. doi: 10.1177/0275074015589629

22. Bevir M, Rhodes R. Governance Stories. Published online April 19, 2006. doi: 10.4324/9780203969090

23. Sandel M. Michael Sandel: What’s the right thing to do? PsycEXTRA Dataset. Published online 2009. doi: 10.1037/e597132010-001

24. Dryzek JS. Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics, Contestations. Oxford University Press; 2006.

25. Hicks D, Wouters P, Waltman L, et al. Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics. Nature. 2015; 520(7548): 429-431. doi: 10.1038/520429a

26. Mintzberg H. Managers not MBAs: A Hard Look at the Soft Practice of Managing and Management Development. Berrett-Koehler; 2004.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-27

Issue

Section

Editorial

How to Cite

Vision of a new journal: Administrative Sciences Research. (2025). Administrative Sciences Research, 1(1), 3422. https://journal.arsl-pub.com/index.php/ASR/article/view/76