Metacognitive scaffolding for foreign language fluency: Algorithmic and integrated learning schemes

Authors

  • Nataliia Tokareva Kryvyi Rih State Pedagogical University, 50000 Kryvyi Rih, Ukraine Author
  • Maryna Tsehelska Kryvyi Rih State Pedagogical University, 50000 Kryvyi Rih, Ukraine Author

Keywords:

metacognition; foreign language fluency; metacognitive scaffolding; concept maps; algorithmic learning; integrated learning schemes; CLIL; cognitive development; recursive learning; educational psychology

Abstract

This article explores the role of metacognitive scaffolding in developing foreign language fluency through the use of algorithmic and integrated learning schemes. Drawing on psycholinguistic and cognitive research, the study presents a theoretical foundation for employing metacognitive models—such as concept maps, discourse structures, and integrated mental schemes—in language instruction. These schemes facilitate learners’ ability to organize, monitor, and regulate their language learning processes. The approach is grounded in the principles of recursion, Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) methodology, and simulation-based learning and is supported by recent developments in metacognitive theory and educational psychology. The article argues that such scaffolding not only enhances linguistic competence but also cultivates deeper cognitive engagement, self-regulation, and fluency. Examples of implementation are provided to illustrate how metacognitive tools can be integrated into foreign language classrooms for meaningful and systematic learning.

References

1. Flavell JH. Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry. American Psychologist. 1979; 34(10): 906-911. doi: 10.1037/0003-066x.34.10.906

2. Borkowski JG, Chan Lorna KS, Muthukrishna N. A process-oriented model of metacognition: links between motivation and executive functioning. In: Issues in the Measurement of Metacognition. Impara Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute of Mental Measurements; 2000.

3. Nelson TO, Narens L. Metamemory: A theoretical framework and new findings. In: Bower GH (editor). The Psychology of Learning and Motivation. New York: Academic Press. 1990; 26: 125-141. doi: 10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60053-5

4. Coyle D, Hood P, Marsh D. CLIL: Content and Language Integrated Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010.

5. Swain M. The Output Hypothesis: Theory and research. In: Handbook of Research in Second Language Teaching and Learning. Routledge; 2005.

6. Tokareva N. Genesis of the Logico-Semantic Organization of Adolescents Speech in the Post-Nonclassical Perspective of the Contemporaneity. Psycholinguistics. 2018; 24(1): 343-359. doi: 10.31470/2309-1797-2018-24-1-343-359

7. Vatan YP. Structure and nature of metacognitive activity (Ukrainian). Naukovyi visnyk Uzhhorodskoho natsionalnoho universytetu. Seriia: Psykholohiia. 2022; 3: 10-14. doi: 10.32782/psy-visnyk/2021.3.2

8. Tokareva N, Tsehelska M. Metacognitive Schemes as a Tool for Teaching English to Young Learners: Psychological Discourse. Revista Romaneasca pentru Educatie Multidimensionala. 2020; 12(4): 53-71. doi: 10.18662/rrem/12.4/333

9. Anisimov AV. Computer Science. Creativity. Recursion (Russian). Kyiv: Naukova dumka; 1988.

10. Angelini ML, García-Carbonell A. Developing English speaking skills through simulation-based instruction. Teaching English with Technology; 2019.

11. Coyle D, Hood P, Marsh D. CLIL: Content and Language Integrated Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010.

12. Yao J, Zhang F, Li H. Research on the Optimization of Oral English Teaching in Junior High School in the Environment of Man-machine Dialogue. Journal of Language Teaching and Research. 2019; 10(5): 1047. doi: 10.17507/jltr.1005.18

13. Tsehelska М. Effective Strategies to Enhance English Language Teaching in Ukraine. Naukovi zapiski; 2018.

14. Azevedo R. Reflections on the field of metacognition: issues, challenges, and opportunities. Metacognition and Learning. 2020; 15(2): 91-98. doi: 10.1007/s11409-020-09231-x

15. Cleeremans A, Achoui D, Beauny A, et al. Learning to Be Conscious. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2020; 24(2): 112-123. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2019.11.011

Downloads

Published

2025-02-24

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Metacognitive scaffolding for foreign language fluency: Algorithmic and integrated learning schemes. (2025). Language Exploration, 1(1), 3193. https://journal.arsl-pub.com/index.php/LE/article/view/81